Clprolf builds upon classical Object-Oriented Programming.
To fully benefit from this guide, readers should already be familiar with:
Clprolf is a language and framework designed to make architectural roles explicit.
In most object-oriented systems, separation of responsibilities relies on discipline.
Clprolf encodes that discipline structurally.
Every class declares what it is.
Clprolf is based on two core principles:
These principles define how Clprolf structures components and relationships.
The class domain is the central subject around which a class is organized. It defines what the class fundamentally represents and what it is responsible for.
File class has a class domain related to file handling.A technical class, by contrast, does not represent a conceptual domain. It provides technical support (e.g., logging, parsing, low-level utilities).
Instead of writing:
public class OrderManager { }
In Clprolf you declare the role:
public class_for agent OrderProcessor { }
or
public class_for worker_agent OrderRepository { }
Each class has a declension (its architectural nature).
The core declensions are:
agent → business responsibilityworker_agent → technical executionmodel → passive domain entityinformation → technical data containerindef_obj → transitional, undefined roleindef_objClprolf does not require architectural clarity upfront.
You can begin with:
public class_for indef_obj OrderManager {
public void process(Order order) {
validate(order);
save(order);
notify(order);
}
}
indef_obj represents a temporary state.
Refactoring can happen later.
After identifying responsibilities:
| Concern | Nature |
|---|---|
| Business validation | Business |
| Persistence | Technical |
| Notification | Technical |
You refactor:
public class_for agent OrderProcessor {
private OrderRepository repository;
private OrderNotifier notifier;
public void process(Order order) {
validate(order);
repository.save(order);
notifier.notify(order);
}
}
public class_for worker_agent OrderRepository { ... }
public class_for worker_agent OrderNotifier { ... }
The behavior is unchanged. The architecture becomes explicit.
Clprolf does not only suggest discipline.
It enforces structural coherence.
Example:
public class_for agent A1AnimalImpl nature AnimalWorker { }
This attempts to inherit a worker_agent from an agent.
Result:
ARCH-A1 => Class A1AnimalImpl:
the parent class should be an agent (AnimalWorker)
The equivalent Java code would compile:
public class A1AnimalImpl extends AnimalWorker { }
Clprolf rejects it as architecturally inconsistent.
Clprolf does not change:
It changes:
Clprolf encodes architectural responsibility at the language level instead of leaving it to convention.